Insurance and Enterprise Operations
Modernizing enterprise insurance workflows to cut approval turnaround time by 50% and increase user satisfaction by 90%.
A large insurance enterprise relied on manual processes to move critical approvals through underwriting, claims, legal, and compliance.
Requests passed between people and departments through email, spreadsheets, and other disconnected processes. Employees spent substantial time forwarding information, requesting updates, locating decision-makers, and determining where individual approvals stood.
As volume increased, maintaining these workflows required additional administrative capacity. Skilled underwriting, claims, legal, and compliance personnel were spending time managing handoffs instead of applying their expertise to higher-value work.
The same fragmentation affected internal communication. Distributed teams and business units relied heavily on email for routine coordination, creating crowded inboxes, delayed responses, duplicated conversations, and limited visibility across operational functions.
The company's technology operations function faced an additional problem. It lacked real-time performance information needed to identify constraints, compare priorities, and determine where improvement resources should be invested.
These appeared to be three separate problems:
Our evaluation found that they shared the same underlying cause. The company's operating processes had not evolved to match the scale and complexity of the enterprise.
United Ops assembled a team of workflow automation, insurance operations, technology, process-improvement, data, and change-management experts to work directly with leaders across underwriting, claims, legal, compliance, technology operations, and internal communications.
The engagement began with an evaluation of how requests, decisions, information, and performance data moved across the organization.
Our experts assessed:
The objective was not simply to digitize existing processes. It was to determine which processes should be eliminated, redesigned, automated, or managed differently before introducing new technology.
The manual approval process created work at every stage.
Employees were required to receive requests, verify information, identify the appropriate reviewer, forward documentation, monitor responses, answer status questions, and manually move completed decisions to the next person.
This produced several connected problems:
Email had become the default coordination system for much of the organization. Important conversations were difficult to separate from routine traffic, information remained trapped in individual inboxes, and distributed teams could not easily see work occurring elsewhere.
Within technology operations, the lack of real-time analytics made it difficult to distinguish isolated problems from recurring performance patterns. Leaders could see outcomes after they occurred but had limited ability to intervene while performance was changing.
The company did not simply need faster technology. It needed a more modern operating system for moving work, sharing information, and managing performance.
Working directly with company leaders and functional teams, United Ops experts implemented three connected improvements.
Approval workflow automation. Our experts designed and built a mobile and web application to automate critical approval workflows across underwriting, claims, legal, and compliance.
The redesigned process established a consistent path from request to resolution, including:
Automation removed administrative steps while preserving the professional judgment, legal review, and compliance controls required for each decision. The application did not replace subject-matter expertise. It allowed that expertise to be applied without the surrounding manual overhead.
Communication modernization. United Ops experts led the transition to Slack as the company's primary internal collaboration platform. The effort extended beyond installing a new communication tool. It included redesigning how teams communicated across departments and operating functions.
Teams established clearer practices for:
The change gave employees more immediate access to relevant conversations and reduced the amount of operational coordination buried inside individual inboxes.
Technology operations modernization. United Ops assembled Six Sigma, ITIL, analytics, data-management, and technology operations experts to evaluate and rebuild the broader performance-management framework.
The redesigned operating model introduced:
This shifted technology operations from retrospective reporting toward active performance management. Leaders gained the ability to see where performance was changing, determine which problems required intervention, and allocate resources using current operating evidence.
Implementation was not treated as complete when the application, collaboration platform, and analytics capabilities became available.
United Ops experts worked with the relevant teams to support adoption, establish new operating practices, and ensure that employees understood how the systems should be used.
This was critical because new technology does not improve performance unless the surrounding behaviors and management routines change with it.
The engagement connected technical implementation with:
The objective was to create lasting operational change, not simply deploy new tools.
The combined modernization effort produced measurable improvements in processing speed, workforce efficiency, communication, and user experience.
| Measure | Result |
|---|---|
| Critical approval turnaround time | 50% reduction |
| Staffing required to manage the same approval volume | 15% reduction |
| Internal email traffic | 23% decrease |
| User satisfaction following operational modernization | 90% increase |
Approval automation cut turnaround time in half while reducing the staffing capacity required to manage the same volume by 15%.
The communication-platform transition reduced email traffic by 23%, allowing more routine collaboration and coordination to occur in shared, visible channels.
Following the Six Sigma and ITIL-driven modernization of technology operations, user satisfaction increased by 90%.
The engagement created value beyond the individual performance measures. For the company, the new operating system supported:
The 15% reduction in staffing requirements represented more than administrative efficiency. It created the opportunity to redirect capacity toward underwriting quality, claims resolution, compliance, customer service, and other work requiring professional expertise.
The results did not come from treating workflow automation, collaboration, and performance analytics as separate technology projects.
United Ops assembled experts capable of evaluating how work moved across the entire organization and then connected the three initiatives through one operating model.
Several factors were critical:
The company did not simply acquire new applications. It developed a faster, more visible, and more scalable way to operate.
United Ops assembles the right combination of operational leaders, workflow specialists, technology experts, data professionals, process-improvement practitioners, and change-management resources around the specific business outcome.
Our experts evaluate the relevant processes, technologies, management systems, and organizational practices before prescribing a solution.
We then work directly with company leadership and functional teams to redesign the operation, implement the appropriate technology, establish performance visibility, and support the behavioral changes required to sustain the improvement.
When manual processes consume professional capacity, the answer is rarely automation alone. The process, technology, data, and operating model must work together.
Simplify the work. Automate the flow. Manage performance in real time.
If skilled people spend their time chasing approvals and status, the process usually needs redesigning before anything gets automated. Let's evaluate how work actually moves.
Industrial Manufacturing
Recurring stoppages and rising unit costs looked like an equipment problem. The real constraint was material flow, frontline leadership, and daily management discipline.
Automotive Electronics and eMobility
Dashboards already showed the losses. What the portfolio lacked was a management system able to turn that data into coordinated action across R&D, engineering, and manufacturing.
